Analysis of the COVID-19 Lockdown Impact on Biological Parameters and Physical Performance in Football Players

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant changes in global sustainability, but specifically, this study analyses the impact of lockdown on health and behavior in the game of football. The 2020/2021 Italian football competitive season (indicated as "post-COVID”), taking place following an obliged lockdown and longer than the normal summery season break, was characterized by very short recovery times and was compared to the 2018–2019 "pre-COVID” season, which had a regular course. The comparisons were about anthropometric and hormonal responses, muscle damage, and the physical performance of players in the major league (Serie A), and were made considering two extreme points of the competitive seasons: before the preparatory period (T0) and at the end of the season (T1). Turning to the results, it is significant to note the following: (1) body fat percentage was lower at the start (T0) of the post-COVID season than at the start of the pre-COVID season. During both seasons, serum CK and LDH increased in T1 and were significantly higher in both T0 and T1 of the post-COVID season. (2) Cortisol and testosterone concentrations increased in both seasons from T0 to T1;however, in the post-COVID season, concentrations of both were higher than in the previous season. The testosterone to cortisol ratio increased at the end of the pre-COVID season, whilst strongly decreasing at T1 of the post-COVID season. (3) Blood lactate concentrations significantly decreased during the pre-COVID season but remained unchanged during the post-COVID season. We may conclude that the enforced suspension period and the consequent rapid resumption of all activities influenced the physical and physiological state of professional footballers.

Physical effects of Covid-19 in patients with diabetes 1 year after hospitalisation in the UK: PHOSP-Covid study

Aim: To investigate the impact of Covid-19 on daily activity, maximal physical performance, and clinical frailty of people living with diabetes (any type) 1-year post-hospitalisation for Covid-19 in the UK. Method(s): This study is part of PHOSP-Covid, a multicentre long-term cohort study that recruited adults (>=18 years) who were discharged from one of the 83 NHS hospitals across the four UK nations following a clinical diagnosis of Covid-19 before March 31, 2021. We compared The Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue, Incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT) distance (m), and clinical frailty (Rockwood frailty level), 5-month and 1-year after discharge in patients with and without diabetes. Result(s): Out of 2545 individuals (538 (21%) with diabetes), the proportion of individuals who classified as either 'mildly frail' or 'moderately or higher frail severity' was higher in individuals with diabetes (month 5: diabetes 9.9%, no diabetes 4.7%;month 12: diabetes 8%, no diabetes 4.9%). ISWT distance in patients with diabetes were significantly lower at both follow-ups but this measure improved from 5-months to 1-year (290 [95% CI: 190-440] vs 370 [250-560] for diabetes and 340 [210-450] vs 420 [270-590] for those without, both p < 0.01). At both time points, people with diabetes reported higher levels of fatigue (36 [24-44] vs 39 [25-46] at 5-month (p = 0.03);37 [26-45] vs 40 [28-47] at 1-year visit (p < 0.01)). Conclusion(s): One year after hospitalisation long Covid is more observed in people with diabetes.

Impact of (long) COVID on athletes' performance: a prospective study in elite football players.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate possible persistent performance deficits after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in elite athletes. METHODS: A prospective cohort study in three Belgian professional male football teams was performed during the 2020 - 2021 season. Participants were submitted to strength, jump, and sprint tests and an aerobic performance test (the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery test (YYIR)). These tests were repeated at fixed time intervals throughout the season. Assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infection was performed by a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test before each official game. RESULTS: Of the 84 included participants, 22 were infected with SARS-CoV-2 during follow-up. At the first testing after infection (52.0 ± 11.2 days after positive PCR testing) significantly higher percentages of maximal heart rate (%HRmax) were seen - within the isolated group of infected players- during (p = .006) and after the YYIR (2 min after, p = .013), compared to pre-infection data. This increase in %HRmax was resolved at the second YYIR testing after infection (127.6 ± 33.1 days after positive PCR testing). Additionally, when comparing the first test after infection in formerly infected to non-infected athletes, significantly higher %HRmax were found during (p < .001) and after the YYIR test (p < .001),No significant deficits were found for the jump, muscular strength or sprint tests.Aerobic performance seems compromised even weeks after infection. Simultaneously, anaerobic performance seemed to be spared. Because of the potential detrimental effects on the immune system, caution might be advised with high-intensity exposure until aerobic performance is restored.KEY MESSAGESElite football players' aerobic performance seems to be affected for weeks after they return to sports after a SARS-CoV-2 infection.Similarly, anaerobic performance tests showed no discernible changes between both before and after SARS-CoV-2 infections.Regular YYIR testing is recommended to monitor aerobic performance after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Functional Impact of Telehealth Physical Therapy Services on Patients Post Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Stem cell transplantation (SCT) in patients with hematological cancers results in longstanding physical changes. Commonly reported symptoms include chronic fatigue, global weakness, interference with activities of daily living (ADLs) and aerobic deconditioning. Aside from the sequela of symptoms experienced post SCT, these patients remain in an immunosuppressed state for several months following discharge from the hospital. Patients are often advised by their medical team to isolate themselves unless to attend follow-up outpatient clinic appointments. With the COVID-19 pandemic, this functional gap in the continuum of care worsened. As a result, SCT patients are both hesitant and discouraged to pursue outpatient or home health physical therapy even when these services are warranted. Thus, there is great need for options to safely optimize function for people post-SCT that are suitable in today's ever-changing environment. The purpose of this case series is to describe the functional impact of incorporating telehealth into the continuum of care for post SCT patients. CASE DESCRIPTION: 9 patients post inpatient admission for SCT were triaged to telehealth PT based on their scores on the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) and the Activity Measure for Post Acute Care (AM-PAC) at the time of discharge from inpatient care. Scores on the SPPB ranged from 5-11, and AMPAC scores ranged from 21-24, demonstrating physical impairment. Patients were scheduled to receive telehealth twice a week. Sessions consisted of therapeutic exercises monitored via secure video software. Lab values were monitored via electronic medical record to assess appropriateness for therapy prior to each session. Rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale and patientowned pulse oximeter were used to monitor patient fatigue levels. Patients' progress was assessed via Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) and 5-times sit to stand (5xSTS) scores. OUTCOME(S): One year post telehealth implementation, patients reported improved independence and achievement of selfselected goals. Notable patient quotes include, "I feel less fearful in climbing up and down the stairs, and I feel more independent with laundry and cooking.which was very important for me." Additionally, patients reported a decrease in LEFS and BFI scores. Initial LEFS scores averaged 40% and dropped to 20% by discharge. Similarly, BFI scores dropped by 2 points at discharge, reflecting improved self-reported functional performance and a return to pre transplant fatigue levels. 5xSTS scores decreased by greater than 3 seconds in 6 of 9 patients, with one patient performing where previously unable. DISCUSSION: Telehealth services provide an additional method of care delivery to those unable to seek it in the traditional sense. For the severely immunocompromised, physical therapy via telehealth provides direct connection to providers trained in oncology rehabilitation serving as a feasible bridge between inpatient and outpatient care for amelioration of side effects associated with SCT.

Resiliency among Older Adults Receiving (Roar) Lung Cancer Treatment: A Feasibility Study

PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: Poor physical performance and negative mood are two risk factors for functional decline among older adults with lung cancer. Yet, targeted interventions to maintain independence prevent functional decline are not well studied. Our primary objective was to assess the feasibility of a novel virtual health physical therapy (PT) plus progressive muscle relaxation (PMR) intervention with longitudinal microbiome biospecimen collection delivered to older adults with advanced lung cancer. Secondary objectives were to characterize functional status and clinical factors pre and post-study intervention. NUMBER OF SUBJECTS: We accrued adults aged >=60 years with advanced non-small cell or extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving treatment at The Ohio State University James Comprehensive Cancer Center (OSU-JCCC) in the Thoracic Oncology department (N=22). There were no exclusion criteria pertaining to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, laboratory values, prior cancer diagnoses, presence of comorbidities, or brain metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Participants were asked about functional status, symptoms, mood through the PHQ-9, GAD-7, POMS, and acceptability questions about the program. PT evaluation and assessment included SPPB and 2- or 6-minute walk test outcomes. The study sought to collect gut microbiome samples for every in-person visit and activity monitoring data (Actigraph) on a subset. Feasibility was defined as successfully collecting specimens, wearing an Actigraph activity monitor, and adhering to the intervention. PT and psychologists evaluated participants in-person at the first and final visit. The rest of the 12-week intervention was conducted via virtual health. Physical therapy intervention consisted of endurance, strength, and flexibility exercises. RESULT(S): In total, 22 patients consented and 18 started the intervention (81.8%). Seven microbiome samples were collected from four participants. Six patients collected activity monitoring data. Among the 18 participants, 11 participants (61.1%) completed 70% or more of all the intervention visits. The SPPB data show a moderate effect size (Cohen's d=0.24) from pre- to post-data. On average patients improved by 1.8 total points on the SPPB. Patients demonstrated improvement on timed walk tests throughout intervention from an average of 108 feet pre-intervention to an average of 138.4 feet post intervention. CONCLUSION(S): Despite the challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic, longitudinal biospecimen and correlative data collection were feasible in the context of PT and PMR intervention among older adults with advanced lung cancer. Virtual physical therapy interventions can be safely delivered to improve physical performance as demonstrated by a moderate effect size for the SPPB in this patient population. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the feasibility study results, delivering a virtual PT intervention to older patients with lung cancer can improve SPPB score leading to decreased frailty and improve quality of life among patients.

Tango-Therapy Intervention for Older Adults with Cognitive Impairment Living in Nursing Homes: Effects on Quality of Life, Physical Abilities and Gait.

Cognitive impairment in older adults is associated with poor gait performance, physical decline, falls and poor quality of life. This paper analyzes the feasibility and efficacy of tango-based intervention in older people living in nursing homes with and without cognitive impairment. A multicenter study, with pre- and post-test, was carried out. Intervention attendance, well-being, physical abilities (short physical performance battery), walking performance, functional capacities (Katz Index) and quality of life (quality of life in Alzheimer's disease) were assessed. Fifty-four participants (84.9 ± 6.7 years, mini mental state examination 14.5 ± 7.4) completed the protocol. Intervention attendance was 92%, and the mean subjective well-being after each session was 4.5 ± 0.5 (on a five-point scale). A statistically significant improvement was found in the quality of life (p = 0.030). Non-statistically significant changes were found in walking performance (p = 0.159), physical abilities (p = 0.876) and in functional capacities (p = 0.253). This study shows feasibility and suggests evidence for the effects of tango therapy on well-being and quality of life. Further studies are necessary to contrast these findings and to support the role of tango interventions as a holistic approach to prevent functional decline in older people with cognitive impairment.

Validity, inter-rater reliability, and feasibility of the Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool for assessing physical function in post-acute COVID-19 patients: A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Various tools have been created to measure physical function during intensive care unit (ICU) stay and after ICU discharge, but those have not been validated in coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) patients. There is a need for a reliable, valid and feasible tool to define the rehabilitation needs of post-ICU COVID-19 patients entering the acute wards and then rehabilitation clinics. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the validity, inter-rater reliability and feasibility of Chelsea Physical Assessment Tool (CPAx) in assessing the functional status of COVID-19 patients after discharge from the ICU. METHODS: Demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients were recorded. Patients were evaluated using the modified Medical Research Council (MRC) dyspnea scale, Functional Oral Intake Scale, Glasgow Coma Scale, CPAx, Barthel Index, Katz Index and MRC sum score, measurements of grip strength obtained by dynamometer, the 5 time sit-to-stand test and 30 seconds and sit-to-stand test. CPAx and the other functional assessment tools were administered to 16 patients within 48 hours following ICU discharge. For inter-rater reliability, another physiatrist independently re-assessed the patients. MRC sum score, Barthel and Katz indexes were used to assess construct validity of CPAx. The discriminative validity of CPAx was determined by its ability to differentiate between patients with and without ICU acquired muscle weakness based on MRC sum score. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine inter-rater reliability for total scores of the functional assessment tools. Cohen's Kappa (κ) coefficient and weighed Kappa (κw) were calculated to determine inter-rater reliability of individual CPAx items. Ceiling and flooring effects were calculated by percentage frequency of lowest or highest possible score achieved. The number and percentages of the patients who were able to complete each tool were calculated to assess feasibility. The CPAx score was strongly correlated with MRC sum score (rho: 0.83), Barthel Index (rho: 0.87) and Katz Index (rho: 0.89) (p< 0.001) showing construct validity. Area under the ROC curve demonstrated that cut off score for CPAx was ⩽ 12 to discriminate patients with MRC sum score < 48, with a sensitivity and a specificity of 100% and 63%, respectively (AUC = 0.859, p< 0.001). ICC was high for CPAx, MRC sum score, Barthel and Katz indexes, Glasgow Coma Scale, and hand grip strength measurement, with the highest value observed for CPAx (ICC, 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71-0.98). κ and κw analysis showed good to excellent inter-rater reliability for individual CPAx items. No floor or ceiling effect was observed at CPAx while floor effect was observed at Barthel Index scores (25%) and Katz Index scores (37.5%). All patients could be evaluated using CPAx while less were physically able to complete the 5 time sit-to-stand, 30 seconds sit-to-stand tests (n= 4) and MRC sum score (n= 14). CONCLUSION: CPAx is a valid, reliable, and feasible tool to assess the physical functional state in COVID-19 patients following discharge from the ICU.

Physical Therapy Management of Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19 in Outpatient Settings: A Scoping Review

Purpose:The devasting effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic have warranted the rapid development of evidence surrounding the physical therapy (PT) management of the disease within inpatient settings. However, the medical community is still working to define the long-term effects of COVID-19, referred to as Postacute Sequalae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), and ways for physical therapists to manage them in outpatient settings. The primary objective of this review was to summarize the available evidence related to the PT management of PASC in outpatient settings. Method(s):A systematic search in PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane CENTRAL, Academic Search Complete, and MedLine yielded systematic and scoping reviews and randomized controlled trials, among others. Data extraction was performed independently by 2 reviewers with 8 studies included. Result(s):Only 3 publications were specific to the outpatient setting area, with 5 more studies that focused on outpatient practice as part of a multisetting study, or the postacute setting. Although the limited number and quality of publications creates challenges applying the interventions provided across a population, each were specific to PASC. Conclusion(s):This review supports the need for further research focused on the PT management of patients who are experiencing PASC in outpatient settings.Copyright © Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Section, APTA.

Physiological effects of regular CrossFit® training and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic-A systematic review.

CrossFit® is a functional fitness training program known for its day-to-day varying "Workouts of the Day" (WOD). In accordance with the 'CrossFit® Level 1 Training Guide', regular CrossFit® training sessions consist of Warm-up, Mobility, Skill/Power training, WOD, and Cool-down. Despite the fast-growing and widespread popularity, data on the practical implementation of the training program based on scientific evidence are rare. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to systematically review the existing literature on the physiological effects of regular CrossFit® training in full extent instead of stand-alone WODs and to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the training behavior of CrossFit® athletes. A systematic search was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines in April 2022 and updated in July 2022 using the following databases: PubMed, SPORTDiscus, Scopus, and Web of Science. Using the keyword "CrossFit", 1,264 records were found. Based on the eligibility criteria, 12 studies are included and separated by topics: acute-short term physiological response (n = 8), and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 4). The results show that studies of regular training sessions were rarely conducted and contradicted the existing knowledge of the physiological demands [e.g., heart rate (HR)] of CrossFit®. In detail, included studies demonstrate that training sessions last 30-60 min and provide a progressive increase in cardiovascular load up to maximal effort activity (>90% HRmax), differing from stand-alone WODs exclusively at high-intensity. Also, scarce research exists on COVID-19-pandemic-induced effects on training behavior, and studies are of moderate to low quality. There is still a lack of comprehensive analyses on the acute physiological effects of regular training sessions and the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in the scientific literature. Moreover, the inconsistent terminology used in CrossFit® research complicates generalized conclusions. Therefore, future research on the training methodology of CrossFit® needs to overcome terminological inequalities and examine scientifically the implementation of the concept by considering regular training sessions under practical settings.

Comparing the Effects of Endurance and Resistance Training Programs on some Pulmonary, Functional, and Quality of Life Indicators in Patients with COVID-19 Discharged from Hospital.

Background and purpose: The present study investigated the effect of six weeks of endurance and resistance training on pulmonary indices, physical performance, and quality of life in COVID-19 patients after discharge from hospital. Material(s) and Method(s): Thirty six patients with COVID-19 (mean age: 38.76+/-0.98 years, mean weight: 81.86+/-2.88 kg) were selected. At the beginning and end of the study, pulmonary (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and MVV), physical (6-minute walk test), quality of life (SF-36), and anthropometry tests were performed. The patients were divided into three groups: Endurance training (45 minutes at 60-75% estimated HR), Resistance training (45 minutes at 40-70% of I-RM), and controls. The intervention was conducted for 6 weeks (3 sessions). One-way ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. Result(s): Findings indicated a significant increase in FEV1 (P=0.029), FVC (P=0.047), FEV1/FVC (P=0.043) in the endurance training group compared to the control group, while difference was observed in MVV (P=0.041) and FEV1/FVC (P=0.022) between endurance training and resistance training groups. The 6-minute test distance increased in the endurance training (P=0.0001) and resistance training (P=0.001) groups compared to the control group, but no difference was observed between the training groups (P=0.48). Endurance and resistance training programs induced significant improvements in physical performance (P=0.024 and P=0.09, respectively) and general health (P=0.022 and P=0.015, respectively) dimensions compared to the control group. Conclusion(s): Moderate-intensity endurance training can improve pulmonary function, physical performance, and quality of life in patients with COVID-19 after discharge from hospital and can be used in rehabilitation programs of these patients.Copyright © 2023, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.

Comparing the Effects of Endurance and Resistance Training Programs on some Pulmonary, Functional, and Quality of Life Indicators in Patients with COVID-19 Discharged from Hospital.

Background and purpose: The present study investigated the effect of six weeks of endurance and resistance training on pulmonary indices, physical performance, and quality of life in COVID-19 patients after discharge from hospital. Material(s) and Method(s): Thirty six patients with COVID-19 (mean age: 38.76+/-0.98 years, mean weight: 81.86+/-2.88 kg) were selected. At the beginning and end of the study, pulmonary (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/FVC, and MVV), physical (6-minute walk test), quality of life (SF-36), and anthropometry tests were performed. The patients were divided into three groups: Endurance training (45 minutes at 60-75% estimated HR), Resistance training (45 minutes at 40-70% of I-RM), and controls. The intervention was conducted for 6 weeks (3 sessions). One-way ANOVA test was used for statistical analysis. Result(s): Findings indicated a significant increase in FEV1 (P=0.029), FVC (P=0.047), FEV1/FVC (P=0.043) in the endurance training group compared to the control group, while difference was observed in MVV (P=0.041) and FEV1/FVC (P=0.022) between endurance training and resistance training groups. The 6-minute test distance increased in the endurance training (P=0.0001) and resistance training (P=0.001) groups compared to the control group, but no difference was observed between the training groups (P=0.48). Endurance and resistance training programs induced significant improvements in physical performance (P=0.024 and P=0.09, respectively) and general health (P=0.022 and P=0.015, respectively) dimensions compared to the control group. Conclusion(s): Moderate-intensity endurance training can improve pulmonary function, physical performance, and quality of life in patients with COVID-19 after discharge from hospital and can be used in rehabilitation programs of these patients.Copyright © 2023, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.

Muscle volume, functionality and metabolic resilience during recovery following severe COVID-19

Introduction: Following hospitalisation with SARS-Cov2 infection a large proportion of individuals report fatigue as a persisting symptom. Here, we performed a detailed study of the muscle for insight into underlying mechanisms. Method(s): Adults were recruited at 5-7 months following hospital discharge for severe SARS-Cov2 infection (n=21), along with control volunteers (n=10) of a similar age, gender, ethnicity and body mass. Perceived fatigue was estimated using the fatigue severity scale. The short physical performance battery test determined habitual functionality, alongside isometric quadriceps strength normalised for appendicular mass and isokinetic force loss during 20 knee extensions (Cybex Norm dynamometer). Leg muscle volume, and phosphocreatine (PCr) resynthesis during recovery from ischemic plantar flexion exercise (an index of muscle metabolic resilience) were quantified using MRI and 31P MRS. Student t-test was used to detect differences between groups and all data are mean (SD). Result(s): Patients (P) reported greater perception of fatigue and demonstrated worse habitual functionality compared to controls (C). However, leg volume [P: 2,578 (303) cm3/m2 vs C: 2,384 (289) cm3/m2, p=0.1], strength [P: 21.8 (4.1) Nm/kg vs C: 21.1 (4.5) Nm/kg, p=0.7], force loss [P: 25% (6) vs C: 21% (10), p=0.1] and PCr recovery kinetics (Qmax) [P: 25.8 (11.3) vs C: 22.8 (8.7), p=0.5] were not different. Conclusion(s): Despite greater perception of fatigue and lower habitual functionality, patients recovering from severe COVID-19 infection did not have altered muscle volume, strength, fatiguability or metabolic resilience compared to controls.

To Evaluate the Correlation between Dasi Mets and the Incremental Shuttle Walk Test (Iswt) in Patients with Cardiovascular Disease (Cvd)

Background The Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) questionnaire assesses functional capacity of patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD[1]figure 1.). DASI derives a total score and corresponding METs level. We utilised this questionnaire during COVID-19 when face to face (F2F) functional capacity testing was an unavailable outcome measure for cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Aim To evaluate the correlation between DASI METs and the incremental shuttle walk test (ISWT)and establish if it is a reliable tool to estimate functional capacity in patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Methods DASI questionnaire was completed over the phone as part of a subjective assessment. Two ISWTs were performed at a F2F appointment prior to starting class, best of two, taken. Measures were repeated post-CR completion. Results 93 patients, 64.5% male, mean age (SD) 65.3 (9.6) years, assessed at baseline. Patients' presentation: 27% NSTEMI, 24% STEMI, 16% Angina, 13% Heart failure and 20% other. Outcomes pre to post CR are shown in table 1. Correlation between DASI METs and the ISWT at baseline was r= 0.32 [weak positive (p<0.05)] and post-CR was r= 0.67[strong positive (p<0.01)]. The ISWT change was similar to the minimum important difference (MID) 70m in the CHD population. There is no MID for the DASI Conclusions Patients attending CR post-pandemic made significant improvements in both the DASI and ISWT. Correlations became stronger post programme, indicating patients may better self-evaluate physical performance after taking part in CR. DASI questionnaire may be a useful alternative outcome measure when F2F exercise testing is not an option. Future work could explore how to prescribe an exercise programme from this and what might represent a meaningful change in this outcome following CR (Table Presented).

Short-term impact of COVID-19 on health-related physical fitness in hospitalized and home-treated patients

Assessment of health-related physical fitness (PF) and body composition (BC) may yield relevant information on body function in patients who have been affected by Coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). Aim of our study was to evaluate the short-term effects of COVID-19 on physical fitness in a real-life cohort of outpatients including hospitalized and home-treated patients. Sixty-four patients (M=36;mean age 56+/-13.5 yrs) previously affected by COVID-19 (25 hospitalized vs. 39 hometreated) in the 3-6 months preceding the study measurements were enrolled. PF was evaluated with the following tests: handgrip strength (HGS), gait speed (GAIT), sit-to-stand (STS), timed up and go (TUG) and Short physical performance battery (SPPB). Phase angle (PhA) was measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) as a proxy marker of fat-free mass composition in terms of body cell mass and cell integrity. Poor PF performance was observed in 38% of subjects for HGS, 55% for GAIT, 30% for STS, 38% for TUG, and 70% for SPPB, while low values of PA were observed in 42% of the study sample in comparison with international cut-offs. The presence of 3-5 impaired values out of five was observed in 38% of patients. All PF tests (and even more the number of abnormal PF tests) consistently correlated with PhA. No differences were reported between hospitalized and home-treated patients. In the short-run, COVID-19 causes a worsening of physical fitness regardless of baseline disease severity. More research is required to systematically measure the extent of functional impairments in COVID-19 and to address whether and how rehabilitation can promote post-infection recovery.

Effects Of An Early Rehabilitation Program In COVID-19 Patients Weaned From Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: The Experience Of A Respiratory Subintensive Unit

Background: The purpose of the study was to verify the variation of some physiopathological-respiratory parameters, physical performance indicators and the ability to carry out activities of daily living in a group of patients suffering from respiratory failure secondary to SARS-CoV2 pneumonia newly weaned from non-invasive ventilation. Method(s): This study was conducted on 20 patients with SARS-CoV2 pneumonia admitted in a COVID-19 subintensive respiratory unit of Cotugno Hospital in Naples, who have just been weaned from non-invasive mechanical ventilation. The experimental group underwent an early rehabilitation lasting 7 days in addition to a specific medical therapy. Result(s): The intragroup comparison showed in the rehabilitation group an improvement in PaO2/FiO2 ratio, respiratory function physical performance measured by "handgrip test" and by "sit to stand test" (number of repetitions, dyspnoea measured by Borg modified scale, muscular fatigue measured by Borg) and in Barthel Index score. The control group showed an improvement only in PaO2/FiO2 ratio and Bathel Index Score. Conclusion(s): An early rehabilitation program initiated immediately after weaning from NIV is effective in improving gas exchanges, physical performance and daily life activities in a group of patients with respiratory failure secondary to SARS-CoV2 pneumonia.

Does the COVID-19 personal protective equipment impair the surgeon's performance?

INTRODUCTION: Despite increasing vaccination rates, new viral variants of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2) are advancing the COVID 19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic and continue to challenge the entire world. Surgical care of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients requires special protective measures. We hypothesized that "COVID-19" personal protective equipment (PPE) during surgery of SARS-CoV-2 positive or potentially positive patients would negatively affect the surgeon and thus the surgical outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten experienced trauma surgeons participated in the study. Each surgeon performed two simulated surgeries of a distal tibial fracture on a Sawbone® under standardized conditions either wearing regular PPE or special COVID-19 PPE. Baseline values at rest were acquired for heart rate, blood pressure, saturation of peripheral oxygen (SpO2), respiratory rate and capillary blood gas (CBG) analysis including capillary partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) and carbon dioxide (pCO2), followed by four different standardized tests of attentional performance (TAP). Subsequently, the surgeon performed the first surgery according to a randomly determined order, with regular or COVID-19 PPE conditions in an operation theatre. After each surgery vital signs were acquired and CBG and TAP were performed again. RESULTS: In our simulated surgical procedure heart rate, respiratory rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure did not show relevant differences. Percutaneously measured SpO2 decreased with additional layers of PPE, while CBG parameters were not affected. TAP tests showed a significant impairment of attention if PPEs were compared to the baseline, but both PPEs had similar results and no meaningful differences could be measured. CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, for surgical procedures additional PPE required during COVID-19 pandemic does not relevant affect the surgeon's mental and physical performance. Surgeries under COVID-19 PPE conditions appear safe and do not increase patient risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Efficacy of a multicomponent exercise training program intervention in community-dwelling older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cluster randomized controlled trial.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused changes in lifestyle for older adults such as reduced physical activity and community participation. Community activity centers were randomly assigned to the intervention (n = 82) or control arm (n = 85). The intervention comprised one 60 min group exercise session per week in weeks 1-8 and an online home exercise program in weeks 9-16. Physical activity, physical performance, and prefrailty rates were assessed at baseline and 16 weeks. At 16 weeks, compared to the control arm, the intervention arm exhibited improved (p < 0.05) leisure-time physical activity (phi = 0.571), vigorous physical activity (phi = 0.534), and moderate-vigorous physical activity (phi = 0.344); prefrailty rates (phi = 0.179); and short physical performance battery results (η2p = 0.113). The intervention thus effectively improved physical activity levels, physical performance, and prefrailty rates in community-dwelling older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Muscle mass and physical function in patients with bladder cancer-Data from a prematurely terminated prospective cohort study.

Background: Patients with bladder cancer (BC) have a high prevalence of comorbidity and low adherence to systemic anticancer treatment but it is unknown whether this is associated with sarcopenia. Objective: We aimed to investigate if the sarcopenia-defining parameters (muscle strength, muscle mass and physical performance) were associated with reduced adherence to systemic anticancer treatment in patients with BC, and if these muscle domains changed during treatment. Methods: Patients >18 years of age with BC referred for chemotherapy or immunotherapy at Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Denmark were eligible for study inclusion. Measurements were performed before treatment initiation and within one week after treatment termination, and consisted of assessments of muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical performance. Data was compared with thresholds outlined by the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older Patient's (EWGSOP2) guidelines and a healthy, age-matched Danish cohort. Results: Over a period of 29 months, we included 14 patients of whom two completed follow-up measurements. The recruitment rate was <50% of planned due to logistics and Covid-19 related limitations. Consequently, a decision to prematurely terminate the study was made. No patients fulfilled EWGSOP2 criteria for sarcopenia, but the majority had reduction in one or more muscle domains compared to healthy, age-matched individuals. The majority of patients had poor treatment tolerance, leading to dose reductions and postponed treatments. Conclusions: In this prematurely terminated study, no patients fulfilled EWGSOP2 criteria for sarcopenia, yet, most patients were affected in one or more muscle domains and the majority had compromised treatment adherence.

Differences in Physical and Mental Health of Older Adults over the Covid-19 Pandemic from Face-to-Face versus Hybrid Methods

Background/Purpose: As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in data collection methods have been introduced in research to ensure continuity despite physical distancing and lockdown restrictions. Our objective was to compare differences in physical and mental health of older adults participating in falls research using data collection methods pre-covid-19 pandemic (face-to-face) and during the pandemic (hybrid). Method(s): Individuals aged 60 years and over with at least one fall in the past 12 months, and controls with no history of falls in the past 12 months were recruited. Pre-pandemic, individuals were interviewed face-to-face exclusively, those interviews after the start of the pandemic were conducted virtually with physical assessments conducted face-to-face to minimize physical contact. Cognitive status, physical performance, psychological status, quality of life, physical activity, and social participation were measured. Result(s): Of the 145 participants of similar socio-demographic backgrounds, 69 were interviewed face-to-face, while 76 were assessed using a hybrid method. Differences were observed in presence of fall characteristics, with fewer fallers seeing a doctor and more fallers attending the emergency department after the start of the pandemic. After adjustment for baseline differences, participants interviewed using hybrid status had lower depression scores (OR (95%CI)=0.29(0.14-0.61)) and stress scores (OR(95%CI)=0.33(0.15-0.72)), but greater fear of falling (OR(95%CI)=2.16(1.04-4.48)) and reduced social participation (OR(95%CI)=2.64(1.20-5.79)). Conclusion(s): Alterations in data collection methods to overcome pandemic restrictions should take into consideration potential differences in individuals who agree to participate as well as the influence of major life events on the psychological status of participants. Copyright © 2022, Full Universe Integrated Marketing Limited. All rights reserved.